wpu.nu

Sida:Pol-2020-05-14 DA21183-04-M Camarate-air-crash.pdf/115

Från wpu.nu

Den här sidan har inte korrekturlästs


if ve look, in this period, we can see that there is a form of food here, which is Warnings payment methods referring to payment authorization numbers. They are looting from CA/ EMGFA on the Directorute-General for Public Accounting '. In other words, CAI EMGFA values on Public Accounting and, in this period, the value was 21 million escudos! So this would be a way of feeding the fund (it seems to me), because then, if we confront this with the war material, which is ahead, in the following table, and we see as it was authorized, with the operation of CREEFA, we also arrived at these conclusions.

In this period, we already have a way to feed the Fund (Fund 05-02), which is that of looting on the Treasury.

Then, here is another form of food, which is the second: «Fund Revenue Debtors / Creditors'. And what was that? This was money resulting from weapons that were approved, and that were approved before April 25, 1974, and that, at a certain point, they were canceled and money was discontinued. This money was feed the Fund. For example, this month, we have here: «Delivery to CAI EMGFA, hy

95

96

FNMAL... », is the National Anmunition and Light Weapons Factory, except in error,« ... resulting from return of a value corresponding to (...) vany war material,

So there are two ways to feed the Fund.

But we also have, during this period, expenses from the Fund. And what expenses are these? If we go on page 61, which is as follows, in the map below, we see how, in this period, the Fund was spent. And we have several things, like, for example, Explosivos da Trafuria, the General Workshops Uniforms and Equipmeni, all ihai is related here, out here, totals the 10 million escudos. Therefore, this would be what is indicated here as Background 05-02. That is, the Fund was fed through the Directorate-General for Accounting Public, also the cancellations of situations of war material and, later, were paid these expenses.

If we make the difference between these values that constitute the Fund's food and the outputs, we obtained a balance of 10 788 791 $ which is not revealed here, but it is the difference between these no types of Fund income, debtors and creditors, and expense.

So, you get the idea that this month more money came in than the one that was spent; what was spent was this way, and now there is extremely terminology confused, but connected with this, I think it's just a matter of terminology. In other words, we have a CREEFA account, where it is possible to confirm that these 22 million - the sum of what came from this Fund 05-02 with debtors and creditors - were deposited in that account, checks were written on the same account of these 10 million, and therefore this was done in account. The terminology is strange, because they call it «Summary of the Fund's income Demand Deposits ». Now, this income from the Demand Deposit fund is precisely the value payments. So this doesn't make sense in terms of terminology, because it's