wpu.nu

Sida:Pol-2020-05-14 DA21183-04-M Camarate-air-crash.pdf/134

Från wpu.nu

Den här sidan har inte korrekturlästs


forced inspiration, the water jets into the lungs and blows up the pulmonary alveoli; or when some substance is forcibly instilled through the airways ».

Excluding the possibility of drowning, Duarte Nuno Vieira enunciates the two possibilities for José Moreira's death:

«If it was caused by an occlusion of the respiratory orifice, we cannot say whether it was or not, we these elemenis, nor was any dissection made at the time, at least it is not written in the report the autopsy, which would eventually be justified if that hypothesis has been anticipated at first, which was to remove the skin to see - because sometimes there are aspects at the level but they can stay internally and you can see when you hit and when you remove the skin from the head - underneath the blood infiltrations and the signs that could reveal this type of situation. Now, it may really be a forced administration of this type of chemical substance, which turns out to be arguably what caused death ».

Asked about the high amount of carbon monoxide, Duarte Nuno Vieira confirmed the unusual fact, but it was less perentious as to the conclusions that could result, as far as where “ toxicological analyzes and methodologies used were not as sensitive as they are today day". It further states the fact that, however, these two possibilities do not imply inconsistencies with the accurate result of the autopsies: the cause of the death of José Moreira and Elisabete Silva was carbon monoxide poisoning. This result, as well as the rupture of the pulmonary alveoli, a consistent line of investigation should have been matched, with the collection of new data, namely the results of the histological exams that will not have been made available to the doctor tanatologist, Fernando Fonseca.

«Histological examinations, in fact, at the time, as far as I remember, were not totally considered by autopsies. But, I repear, I do not have the exact knowledge of how

113

114

things happened at the time, I'm just talking about what I had access 10, the documentation that was provided to us. The expert at the time was even a good expert, as autopsies are well done', are detailed and well described, contrary to the autopsies of other victims in the Camarate case that I had the opportunity to appreciate earlier and that they had some shortcomings and shortcomings. The autopsies of these two victims are well prepared and are complete, are very well executed.

Now, I don't know if the experi had histology reports before completing these autopsies, should have had, but I think thai, later, in the statements that I had occasion to read and that he paid at the time, he expressed his surprise when he noticed the rupture of the alveoli pulmonary, in view of the situation and the conclusions he had drawn up ".

Regarding the work carried out in the examinalion of cadavers, Duarte Nuno Vieira stated that he would have concluded in the same way, but that could have possibly signaled, in a proper place in the report, the lack of consistency of the rupture of the pulmonary alveoli with the thesis of accidental death;

«Anyway, let me tell you that, obviously, in terms of completing the autopsy and