wpu.nu

Sida:Pol-2020-05-14 DA21183-04-M Camarate-air-crash.pdf/137

Från wpu.nu

Den här sidan har inte korrekturlästs


On November 28, 2013, the attorneys general were heard at the Commission deputies João Dias Borges and José Ribeiro Afonso.

Both prosecutors were involved in the elaboration of a PGR disciplinary inquiry into the performance of the Judiciary Police and the Institute of Legal Medicine. This inquiry look place in the following the deficiencies pointed out to the investigation by the V Eventual Commission of Inquiry Camarate accident

The objective of the inquiry was, therefore, to determine disciplinary responsibilities to the Institute of Medicine Legal (João Dias Borges) and the performance of the PJ (in charge of José Ribeiro Afonso). The result of it, validated by the then Attorney General of the Republic, Dr. Cunha Rodrigues, concluded that it was not no disciplinary offense has been committed. It was 1992.

The report that resulted from that disciplinary investigation confirmed the fact that the results of the histological examinations on the tissues of José Moreira and Elisabete Silva were only completed on 7 April 1983.

X CPITC MPs showed some strangeness because the results of the examination histological findings, mentioned in the PGR report, did not precipitate the reopening of the process. On this lopic, allorney João Dias Borges stated the following:

«As the Honorable Member knows, the reopening of any criminal case has an own procedure. When making an inquiry into liability disciplinary action, this question passes by the respective inquirer. I, at least, didn't know that elements were in the respective criminal process, which probably existed, but there was a inquiry process at the time. In fact, i don'ı know if it was an inquiry or if it was an instruction preparatory, I no longer remember well, but there was a process that was opened. Now, all these elements to be carried was there, and we were conducting an inquiry about the disciplinary responsibility rather than making an inquiry or an assessment the way of deciding on that criminal proceeding ».

In addition to keeping the disciplinary and procedural arcas separatc, thc said attorncy mentions, in the report, the contradictions between the different reports, in order to conclude the following:

«The causes of death are shown to be correctly determined. in medico-legal terms, not appropriate to attribute any correlation to the medico-legal examinations to consider that the explanation of the death of José Moreira and his companion are inconsistent ».

116

117

For the preparation of the PGR report, the doctor's words were also taken into account Thanatologist to llI CEAC, in 1986, who, among other statements, said the following:

«In the corpse's blood, the presence of carboxyhemoglobin reaching saturation was revealed 85%, much higher than the deadly limit. (...) There is carbon monoxide the victims, (...) carbon monoxide is a light, odorless, tasteless gas thai rises and