wpu.nu

Sida:Pol-2020-05-14 DA21183-04-M Camarate-air-crash.pdf/85

Från wpu.nu

Den här sidan har inte korrekturlästs


build a narrative, as wę now say, around hypotheses that had no sustainabilin and to which, at the time, naively, 1 joined, which was the hypothesis that such firefighters cut the cables and caused the appearance of snails, which, afterwards, they appeared sirangely at the pilot's foot and that later came to be discovered, underneath. in the area where the hole in which the explosion occurred.

(...)

So this is a forgery. This gentleman committed a complete perjury and I presented complaint from him.

3. Facts found

The creation of a new Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry into the Camarate Tragedy either the expected continuity of the investigations initiated by the previous IX CPITC, or the declarations of Fernando Farinha Simões in relation to the confessed perpetrators of the attack that victimized, others, Prime Minister Francisco Sá Carneiro and Defense Minister Adelino Amaro da Costa, to December 4, 1980.

In addition to the testimonies of the confessed agents involved in the attack, the CPI's work focused on their diverse and possible mobiles, as well as other issues: i) were the expertise of the Overseas Military Defense Fund (FDMU), as well as the audit of accounts of the CEMGFA Office, both drawn up within the framework of the VIII Commission of Inquiry into Tragedy Camarate, but that had the time limit of 1980 - this work would be carried out by the General Inspection of Finance, having been designated as “Final Audit to the

67

68

Military Defense of Overseas ”; ii) the possibility of exporting arms to Iran in 1980), and above all the concern expressed by the government of the time on the subject, was one of the possible reasons for the attack on December 4, 1980; iii) a investigation into the origin of José Moreira's death on the eve of his testimony at the Commission Congressman of Inquiry into the Camarate Tragedy, in 1983; iv) numerous testimonies were heard, of which Diana Andringa and Isabel Veiga de Macedo stand out; vii) the confessed perpetrators of the attack, leading the present rapporteur to take stock of his versions relating to December 4, 1980; viii) political and military entities were heard who, depending on the political positions they held at the time, they could contribute to the clarification of facts; ix) Finally, some difficulties were felt during the work of the CPI, which described in the next chapter.

3.1. Historical context

3.1.1. Testimony of Júlio Castro Caldas

The present Commiltec of Inquiry sought to ascertain the context in whicli, at the time of the facts,