wpu.nu

Sida:Pol-2020-05-14 DA21183-04-M Camarate-air-crash.pdf/113

Från wpu.nu

Version från den 28 december 2020 kl. 20.10 av Botten Anna (diskussion | bidrag) (Auto Google Cloud Vision OCR (mopocr2.py))
(skillnad) ← Äldre version | Nuvarande version (skillnad) | Nyare version → (skillnad)
Den här sidan har inte korrekturlästs


engineering (...). We have the bank accounts that supported these movements, and the bank reconciliation. It was done. So, we have the information that this money went out really from the bank account'.

Again highlighting the non-corroboration of expenses through the analysis of invoices and contracts of contract award, the inspectors reinforced this idea throughout the hearing:

« He says that the money was used to build a sports pavilion. Now, if that pavilion was actually built? We think so, but there is no tender, supplier invoices... Basically, the only clements we obtained were from the General Staff, where there were only a few launches, it was not

93

94

work process, direct use of money (...). We have here the entity that received the constructions. We have here the entity that received the work. We have it here, but in a generic way. That is, there is no specific docuinent, through which we can say: «Look, it was this way...! That work was done ...! The whole process is here! », And that's it, it really justifies that it was done. No, not that! ».

With regard to the transfer of funds, asked who had the competence to authorizing these movements, the inspectors stated, based on testimonies, the following:

  • f...) The head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, but it was the EMGFA Administrative Council that moved it (...). What he (António Augusto Gaspar Correia] says here is that whoever decided on the application of money - it is in these minutes that I am reading - he was the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, but it was the Council who moved ".

However, no evidence was found on the approval of private fund accounts by of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces and his subsequent submission to the Minister of Finance:

« Reaffirming what the Honorable Member said, as it existed, the FDMU was extinguished and the balance passed to the private fund. The accounts of the private fund should be approved by the Head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces and submitted to the Minister of Finance. We do not we found evidence of that .

iii) Clarification of the role of CREEFA in the management of the FDMU

The final audit to the FDMU was also requested to ascertain the role of CREEFA in the management of Bottom. CREEFA had been created by Decree Law No. 18 368 of May 4, 1968, a diploma that authorized the « Government to open credits for national defense for the re-equipment extraordinary " of the two branches of the military - the Army and the Air Force.

The result brought to light by the report showed that in the years 1975 and 1976 there was a outflows of money from the FDMU account at Banco de Angola to the EMGFA CA, with the