wpu.nu

Sida:Pol-1996-10-10 HBE17832-01 alla-förhör-Eugene-DeKock.pdf/11

Från wpu.nu

Version från den 24 november 2024 kl. 10.35 av Utredaren (diskussion | bidrag)
(skillnad) ← Äldre version | Nuvarande version (skillnad) | Nyare version → (skillnad)
Den här sidan har korrekturlästs


- 11 (12) -

Eugene de Kock: and ammunition, which was obviously ?, and he could be made to stand trial, and the president of this country is prepared to give him amnesty just in a change for the name and address I think he would except it.

If he still continues with it, then there must be a very good reason or there must be something which is threatening, not him, but somebody else who is close to him or something like that.

But I made certain notes here for you people to look at, which I would have done if I were in your shoes.

I have never been in Scandinavia. I don't know what powers you have, how your constitution works, except that it works.  Helt stycke maskerat 

 Helt stycke maskerat 


ÅKL Jan Danielsson: Is that the knowledge you have, that he wasn't the gunman?

Eugene de Kock:  Helt stycke maskerat 


ÅKL Jan Danielsson: It's a conclusion you make?

Eugene de Kock:  Helt stycke maskerat . I have no doubt that there must have been a formal surveillance.

If it wasn't surveillance, there must have been a leakage from within the household or whatever.

If it wasn't a leakage then it might have been a penetration of the household, wife, a love affair or whatever. I've made quite substancial notes. But that is conclusions.

 Helt stycke maskerat