and ammunition, which was obviously ?, and he could be made to stand trial, and the president of this country is prepared to give him amnesty just in a change for the name and address I think he would except it. If he still continues with it, then there must be a very good reason or there must be something which is threatening, not him, but somebody else who is close to him or something like that. But I made certain notes here for you people to look at, which I would have done it I were in your shoes. I have never been in Scandinavia. I don't know what powers you have, how your constitution works, except that it works.D: Is that the knowledge you have, that he wasn't the gunman?
K:D: It's a conclusion you make?
K:have no doubt that there must have been a formal surveillance. If it wasn't surveillance, there must have been a leakage from within the household or whatever. If it wasn't a leakage then it might have been a penetration of the household, wife, a love affair or whatever. I've made quite substancial notes. But that is conclusions.